Physicians Group Urges Easing of Ban on Medical Marijuana

—– Original Message —–
From: "Richard Lake" <>
To: <>
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 5:11 AM
Subject: [mmjlist] US: Physicians Group Urges Easing of Ban on Medical

> URL:
> Newshawk:
> Pubdate: Fri, 15 Feb 2008
> Source: Los Angeles Times (CA)
> Section: A
> Webpage:
> Copyright: 2008 Los Angeles Times
> Contact:
> Website:
> Details:
> Author: Eric Bailey, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer
> Referenced: The American College of Physicians position paper
> Bookmark: (Marijuana – Medicinal)
> It Calls on the Government to Drop Pot’s Shared Classification With Drugs
> Such As Heroin and LSD That Are Considered to Have No Medicinal Value.
> SACRAMENTO — A large and respected association of physicians is calling
> on the federal government to ease its strict ban on marijuana as medicine
> and hasten research into the drug’s therapeutic uses.
> The American College of Physicians, the nation’s largest organization of
> doctors of internal medicine, with 124,000 members, contends that the long
> and rancorous debate over marijuana legalization has obscured good science
> that has demonstrated the benefits and medicinal promise of cannabis.
> In a 13-page position paper approved by the college’s governing board of
> regents and posted Thursday on the group’s website, the group calls on the
> government to drop marijuana from Schedule I, a classification it shares
> with illegal drugs such as heroin and LSD that are considered to have no
> medicinal value and a high likelihood of abuse.
> The declaration could put new pressure on Washington lawmakers and
> government regulators who for decades have rejected attempts to reclassify
> marijuana.
> Bush administration officials have aggressively rebuffed all attempts in
> Congress, the courts and among law enforcement organizations to legitimize
> medical marijuana.
> Clinical researchers say the federal government has resisted full study of
> the potential medical benefits of cannabis, instead pouring money into
> looking at its negative effects.
> A dozen states including California have legalized medical marijuana, but
> the federal prohibition has led to an enforcement tug of war.
> In California, federal agents continue to raid cannabis dispensaries, and
> the small cadre of physicians specializing in writing cannabis
> recommendations so that people can use medical marijuana has come under
> regulatory scrutiny.
> Given the conflicts, most mainstream doctors have steered clear of medical
> marijuana.
> The American College of Physicians’ position paper calls for protection of
> both doctors and patients from criminal and civil penalties in states that
> have adopted medical-marijuana laws.
> "We felt the time had come to speak up about this," said Dr. David Dale,
> the group’s president. "We’d like to clear up the uncertainty and anxiety
> of patients and physicians over this drug."
> Medical-marijuana advocates embraced the position paper as a watershed
> event that could help turn the battle in their favor.
> Bruce Mirken, a San Francisco spokesman for the Marijuana Policy Project,
> said the ACP position is "an earthquake that’s going to rattle the whole
> medical-marijuana debate."
> The group, he said, "pulverized the government’s two favorite myths about
> medical marijuana — that it’s not supported by the medical community and
> that science hasn’t shown marijuana to have medical value."
> But officials at the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy
> said calls for legalizing medical marijuana were misguided.
> "What this would do is drag us back to 14th century medicine," said Bertha
> Madras, the agency’s deputy director for demand reduction. "It’s so
> arcane."
> She said guidance on marijuana as medicine ought to come from the U.S.
> Food and Drug Administration, which she said is unlikely ever to approve
> leafy cannabis as a prescription drug.
> Two oral derivatives of marijuana’s psychoactive ingredient, THC, have won
> FDA approval, and the agency is also in the early stages of considering a
> marijuana spray.
> An FDA spokeswoman declined to comment on the group’s position and
> referred inquiries to a 2006 media advisory noting that the agency has
> never approved of smoked marijuana as a medical treatment
> In the 12 years since California voters approved the nation’s first-ever
> medical marijuana law, several medical organizations —
> including the American Nurses Assn. and the American Public Health
> Assn. — have urged Congress to make cannabis a legal medicine.
> But the ACP is second in size only to the American Medical Assn., which
> has about 240,000 members.
> The AMA has urged research into medical marijuana but opposes dropping it
> from Schedule I. Backers of the ACP’s position expressed hope that it
> could help nudge the AMA to adopt a similar stance.
> "This could be a sea change," said Dr. Abraham L. Halpern, a professor
> emeritus at New York Medical College.
> Halpern said he intends to petition the AMA to endorse rescheduling
> marijuana and to push for changes in federal regulations that would
> prevent federal anti-drug agencies — the U.S. Drug Enforcement
> Administration and the National Institute on Drug Abuse — from having
> virtual veto power over cannabis research.
> The ACP position paper urges the use of non-smoked forms of cannabis as
> well as further research to identify the illnesses best treated with
> cannabis and the proper dosages for specific conditions.
> It called for further research into cannabis as a pain reliever for
> conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis and as an aid in treatment of
> neurological and movement disorders such as spasticity, pain and tremor in
> patients with multiple sclerosis, spinal-cord injuries and other trauma.
> But it cast doubt on marijuana’s efficacy for treating epilepsy and
> intraocular pressure caused by glaucoma, conditions that cannabis
> specialists in California routinely recommend be treated with pot.
> The biggest effect of the report could be symbolic.
> With a presidential campaign under way, the ACP’s stand could gain
> traction on the campaign trail or in a new administration.
> "It’s going to depend on how the wind is blowing — how we the people are
> thinking and reacting, where we stand on this," said Dr. Jocelyn Elders,
> U.S. surgeon general during the Clinton administration and a professor
> emeritus at the University of Arkansas School of Medicine.
> "I think we’ve come a long way in the last decade or so."
> ———————————————————————
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> —
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database:
> 269.20.6/1280 – Release Date: 2/15/2008 9:00 AM


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.